Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor
I didn’t say that Fleisher endorsed anybody. He said that Romney was fading, and Santorum was rising, and that Romney wasn’t likely to succeed.

That is a total abandonment of the position that Romney was the likely, sensible candidate.

Incidentally, your conclusions and evasions in this post are equally bunk.

If you're capable of rational discussion (not sure from what I see here), I will add to the comments of Mike DeWine (whom I cannot stand, btw), that here in Ohio, observing what he is seeing on the ground, the enthusiasm is for Santorum.

Mikey is fully establishment, he was not endorsing any more than Ari, but was observing that the conservative voters.....yes, the CONSERVATIVE voters........are enthused about Santorum.

You'll have to deal with that, ed. Because it's true.

58 posted on 02/22/2012 6:57:55 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: ohioWfan
Santorum did poorly in the debate tonight.

I'm thinking the race has changed, but not sure who it favors right now. I get to vote next week, I am not certain who I will vote for because I prefer Gingrich right now, but may vote Santorum to help deal a blow to Mitt. That would make it a tactical vote, but as I said, the very poor performance Rick had tonight will truly shake his momentum.

Such a strange primary.......

83 posted on 02/22/2012 9:17:56 PM PST by Lakeshark (NbIttoalbl,cRwIdtaa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson