Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paul51

I don’t think too many officers...or soldiers for that matter...are “proud” of what they have to do in inflicting harm on other people as a part of their duty. But they do it anyway because it is their duty and to allow domestic or foreign criminals or enemies to escape brings a worse set of problems.

The officer and his actions were reviewed and cleared.

Maybe he was not in a good position to “chase her down” but could fire the taser. I wouldn’t judge so harshly. The woman was a criminal who had left the scene of a hit and run, had evaded police capture for five months, and who, when captured, broke free and tried to run.

As you say, she is the one responsible. So, short of being there and knowing that what you are speculating at is actually true (ie. he was too lazy...a pretty harsh judgement), I would not try and place the weight of guilt (or blame) on this officer. He was cleared, and IMHO, ought to have been cleared.

A sad tragedy that she fell such that she incurred a brain injury...but, IMHO, that unfortunate consequence belongs completely to her.


16 posted on 02/21/2012 8:02:54 AM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Head
A sad tragedy that she fell such that she incurred a brain injury...but, IMHO, that unfortunate consequence belongs completely to her.

Bullcrap. This was not a violent felon evading a felony arrest. He is too fat to run 50 feet. And she was handcuffed! Amazing how people back almost any action stupid cops make. FReepers should know better.

32 posted on 02/21/2012 8:12:18 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Watch the video, he was maybe 3 feet behind her when he tased her, he’s a fat lazy ass who frankly has no business being on the force IMHO.. If you can’t cover 3 feet between you and a 90 lbs woman and pull a tazer in that situation, you are a flat out disgrace. I don’t care what the review board says.

Based on that video, the review board was just protecting the thin blue line, nothing more. I truly hope this guy is absolutely fiscally destroyed in the courts and never allowed to wear a badge other than maybe mall guard again.


34 posted on 02/21/2012 8:12:26 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
I don't think the video of the incident supports your evaluation of the incident very well. There was no need to kill the woman. We can say that the officer had no intent on killing her but using the same judgment we have to believe the woman didn't for see such an outcome to her own actions.
41 posted on 02/21/2012 8:18:16 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

This is the problem I have with ‘non lethal’ weapons.

Did this woman do anything that would have warranted deadly force? Or even pulling a pistol out of a holster?

As far as I can tell - no.

So why use a taser on her? I understand she was running...but that doesn’t threaten the officer’s safety. Sure, she might have gotten away (although I doubt it). But, would the officer have pulled out his pistol and shot her, to prevent escape? No way.

These tasers in particular are mis-used. They should not be used to ‘catch’ people...or prod them out of cars...or force people to ‘comply’. They are a weapon...and the police should only use weapons on we the people, if we physically threaten them.


50 posted on 02/21/2012 8:24:36 AM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson