Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehring; trisham; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; Coleus; narses; Lesforlife; EternalVigilance; ...
"I mean, I talk about it because I have a precise understanding of how difficult problems are to be solved," Paul continued. "And they're not to be at the national level. We're not supposed to nationalize these problems."

Which once again establishes that Paul IS NOT pro-life, he is pro-choice-by-state.

16 posted on 02/20/2012 12:27:34 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
Which once again establishes that Paul IS NOT pro-life, he is pro-choice-by-state.

**************************

Exactly right. The "proof" that his fans often offer regarding the claim that he is pro-life is that he delivered babies. What a joke. He's an arrogant fraud whose career is being propped up by those who love his positions regarding drugs and the military.

23 posted on 02/20/2012 12:40:42 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

So is Sarah Palin...


63 posted on 02/20/2012 2:40:45 PM PST by Bubba_Rebel (Liberty minded!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson