Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeReign
Not as long as more kids equals more unfunded entitlement spending and more deficit spending.

If that is what you think of taxpayers' children you have a very poor understanding upon how much we depend upon them for our future, entitlements or no.

64 posted on 02/19/2012 9:11:38 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The RNC would prefer Obama to a conservative nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie
Not as long as more kids equals more unfunded entitlement spending and more deficit spending.

If that is what you think of taxpayers' children you have a very poor understanding upon how much we depend upon them for our future, entitlements or no.

Your response is utter nonsense.

There are some types of federal government spending where an increase in population equals a decrease in the tax load for individual tax payers. Defense spending is one such example. We don't need more defense spending when the population increases. In those cases, an increase in population is a good thing.

Unfortunately the large majority of our budget is unfunded entitlements, where a person takes out more from the system than they put in. As long as that is the case, increasing the population DOES NOT decrease the tax load, it only increases it.

That's an FDR type of Ponzi scheme.

BTW, why does every response from you contain snark?

66 posted on 02/19/2012 9:29:32 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson