You make the same assumptive/straw man error Mariner made in post #33...
Mariner came up with the out-of-thin air comment that theological issues with Obama would be "forefront, every day" matters...never mind that he has no track-record proof or evidence that Santorum runs a campaign that way.
And you, Appollo, have already made one Santorum theological comment into an entire "campaign" -- and made it a bogie man "campaign" at that.
Prove it that this a full-blown "campaign"...and if you can't, then you & Mariner need to reconsider the gossip straw men you so easily toss around.
“And you, Appollo, have already made one Santorum theological comment into an entire “campaign” — and made it a bogie man “campaign” at that.
Prove it that this a full-blown “campaign”...and if you can’t, then you & Mariner need to reconsider the gossip straw men you so easily toss around. “
Yes I can. Look at his campaign website. What are the first “Issues” on his positions page? I’ll give you a hint. It’s about pornography. The next one is about his grandpa and being a coal miner and believing in America and blah blah blah.
Now compare that to the campaign website of Herman Cain, or Newt Gingrich, or the former website of Rick Perry.
What difference do you see here?