Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: donmeaker

When I wrote “Their actions after that caused the rebellion.” I meant the actions of English troops after the tea party caused the rebellion.

Look carefully at what England did to occupied Boston after the Tea Party. Contrast that with the actions of Lincoln before the firing on Ft. Sumter.

“We are not enemies, but friends...” was taken by the rebels of 1860 as a declaration of war.


26 posted on 02/18/2012 12:38:18 PM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: donmeaker

Nice try again, but epic fail. Lincoln was the decider. There was no chance that the South would invade the North. Lincoln’s disclaimers were short-lived, and did not reflect his actions. I am NOT a Lincoln-hater, and I understand that it may have been impossible for any politician to step back from the brink at the time. But, he could have, if he had chosen, to allow seperation peacefully. Anyone who thinks that was impossible is not able to think in even a modestly critical fashion.


30 posted on 02/18/2012 12:50:55 PM PST by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can still go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson