As to the policy I “seem to be pursuing” as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt. I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be “the Union as it was.” If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.
http://www.brotherswar.com/Civil_War_Quotes_4c.htm
EVERYTHING was about saving the Union of the States
For Lincoln everything was about saving the Union. By contrast, everything in the pretended confederacy was about protecting and preserving slavery. To extend the bounds of slavery, they would raise 100,000 men to invade other states. To preserve slavery, they would destroy the Union. To preserve slavery, they would draft men to fight, yet exempt slave owners. To preserve slavery they would refuse to raise soldiers of African ancestry. If the south was raising African ancestry soldiers and giving them their freedom, there was no point to the rebellion.