Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top GOP Senator Says ‘If Romney Loses Michigan, We Need a New Candidate’
ABC News ^ | Feb 17, 2012 | Jonathan Karl

Posted on 02/17/2012 3:02:34 PM PST by M. Thatcher

A prominent Republican senator just told me that if Romney can’t win in Michigan, the Republican Party needs to go back to the drawing board and convince somebody new to get into the race. “If Romney cannot win Michigan, we need a new candidate,” said the senator, who has not endorsed anyone and requested anonymity. The senator believes Romney will ultimately win in Michigan but says he will publicly call for the party to find a new candidate if he does not. “We’d get killed,” the senator said if Romney manages to win the nomination after he failed to win the state in which he grew up. “He’d be too damaged,” he said. “If he can’t even win in Michigan, where his family is from, where he grew up.” What about Rick Santorum? “He’d lose 35 states,” the senator said, predicting the same fate for Newt Gingrich. It would have to be somebody else, the senator said. Who? “Jeb Bush,” the former Florida governor.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: bush; jeb; romney; stayoutofthebushes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last
To: M. Thatcher

Another chicken-hearted, conservative-hating, RINO... ugh!!


121 posted on 02/17/2012 4:47:52 PM PST by Southnsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach; onyx; b9; Marguerite; hoosiermama

I had an enlightening but disturbing conversation with one of my oldest friends today. Haven’t talked politics with her in a good while, since her husband is gravely ill. Her husband’s family has roots in PA going back to William Penn, they know all the movers and shakers in politics, particularly in the Pittsburg area. They live 6 mos out of each year in PA and have been back up there about a month.

Today she told me she was upset because she had been going to vote for Mitt Romney, but now she’s hearing from GOP insiders that Santorum and Romney have cut a deal. The only thing that is being worked out in the Primaries right now is which one of them will be at the top of the ticket.

According to her, this deal has the blessing of the GOP establishment and that is why they are not worried about a brokered convention. Whoever gets the most delegates gets the top spot, with the other being assured of the VP slot.

Politics in this country has all of the ethics and credibility of professional wrestling!


122 posted on 02/17/2012 4:49:07 PM PST by conservativejoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
Gingrich or Santorum could make the other his VP candidate and nominate Paul as Secretary of the new cabinet-level Department of Liberty, the sole job of which will be to identify agencies and other cabinet-level departments for pruning or elimination, as well as planning how not to allow the dumping of that many bureaucrats on the public streets with honest people to lead to something really bad.

Now we're talking about a game plan!!!!!

123 posted on 02/17/2012 4:51:53 PM PST by boxlunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Going to do my best!!!!


124 posted on 02/17/2012 4:53:57 PM PST by Springman (Rest In Peace YaYa123 and Bahbah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

So if Willard wins by 100 votes we gotta keep him?


125 posted on 02/17/2012 4:54:43 PM PST by silverleaf (Funny how all the people who are for abortion are already born)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

Actually remember a brokered convention. It was standard practice that number one was Presidential candidate, number two was VP

Can’t remember the President that first got to select his own running mate. Maybe another freeper can enlighten us.


126 posted on 02/17/2012 4:55:06 PM PST by hoosiermama (Stand with God and Sarah, the Gipper and Newt will be standing next to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy
If this is true, then Santorum is exactly what I thought he was...an opportunist. Lord I hope you're wrong.
127 posted on 02/17/2012 4:58:20 PM PST by lula (Newt 2012! We need him now more than ever because the establishment is scared.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia

The question is more of “What the heck is wrong with our voting electorate?”... as we vote these idjits into power and do not remove them for cr@p like this.


128 posted on 02/17/2012 5:00:25 PM PST by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
Hooray!
129 posted on 02/17/2012 5:06:51 PM PST by Shady (The undeniable truth of the Obama Administration...The numbers do not lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh
My guess is that McLame is the unnamed senator rino.

He would know a loser when he saw one, wouldn't he?

130 posted on 02/17/2012 5:10:37 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

The GOP establishment has been trying to shove a Romney candidacy down our throats for over a year (at least). If Romney’s a bad horse to bet on now (and he is), it’s their fault, not ours. Leaving aside for a moment whether or not Jeb Bush would be a good candidate, I think such a move would be seen widely and correctly as panic.

At this point, I don’t think we have any choice but to play the hand we’re holding, which I admit isn’t exactly an inside straight. All three of our remaining candidates are flawed in one way or another. So, we go with the best of the bunch (i.e. Not Mitt) and do our best to get him elected.


131 posted on 02/17/2012 5:21:33 PM PST by DemforBush (Six o'clock in *Berlin*. They were having lunch in Cleveland.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Col Frank Slade
"I bet the “anonymous” Senator is Lugar."

Kyl or Blunt. Lugar wouldn't use a number, never talks in specifics.

132 posted on 02/17/2012 5:22:20 PM PST by StAnDeliver ("We will not comply.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lula; onyx; hoosiermama; Christie at the beach; Marguerite

The word from PA is that Santorum is very much under the control of the GOP Establishment. Since the drubbing he took in his last Senate race, he goes along to get along, aand he wants to be President so badly that he didn’t hesitate to take the deal.

If this plays out, there are going to be a lot of people who are voting for Santorum to get rid of Mitt in for a big shock. Even if Mitt comes in second and is offered the VP slot, because of the GOP E “rules”, he’ll be top dog in the next election cycle, and the Establishment Coronation of Mitt starts all over again.

Our only hope is if Newt gets enough delegates to deny Rick and Mitt’s combined votes from being enough to seal the deal.


133 posted on 02/17/2012 5:29:44 PM PST by conservativejoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: dforest
"A brokered convention would only mean you will get another RINO other than Mitt."

As long as Mittens is +1 delegate, a brokered convention will get us Mittens because that's exactly who the GOP establishment brokering the convention have paid for.

134 posted on 02/17/2012 5:30:50 PM PST by StAnDeliver ("We will not comply.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Not to mention that Romney has all the Wall Street backing.

Yep, you are probably right about that. If not Mitt, it will be another of their choosing.

The place to beat them is in the primaries.


135 posted on 02/17/2012 5:36:31 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

““We’d get killed,” the senator said if Romney manages to win the nomination after he failed to win the state in which he grew up. “He’d be too damaged,” he said. “If he can’t even win in Michigan, where his family is from, where he grew up.” What about Rick Santorum? “He’d lose 35 states,” the senator said, predicting the same fate for Newt Gingrich. It would have to be somebody else, the senator said. Who? “Jeb Bush,” the former Florida governor.”

I KNEW, it: when I saw the headline, I just knew Jebbie Bush would have to feature in the calculation.

Well, unnamed CINO Republican senator, I have news for you—if you think Romney would be killed and that Gingrich and Santorum would lose 35 states, your boy Jeb would likely lose 45 states because conservatives are sick of big government elites like the Bushes, liberals hate them, and that only leaves a few squishy moderates like you guys.


136 posted on 02/17/2012 5:47:13 PM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newfreep
The country will never vote for a third member of the same family. Jeb will never be President.

Of course, his father is still eligible to serve another term...

BUSH 41 + 45

137 posted on 02/17/2012 6:03:15 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

I don’t believe it. They are both losing to Obama by about the same margin and there is no way if Santorum is the nominee he picks Romney as VP.


138 posted on 02/17/2012 6:05:23 PM PST by erlayman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: erlayman

The key is, can Santorum get enough delegates to seal the nomination. If that happens, I’d say you are right.

If it takes Santorum and Romney’s combined delegates to get to the magic number, Santorum will do what the GOP E says.


139 posted on 02/17/2012 6:20:57 PM PST by conservativejoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

Sounds like McLame.


140 posted on 02/17/2012 6:29:19 PM PST by hattend (Jesus wants me to make churches pay for abortions. - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson