Posted on 02/17/2012 6:18:57 AM PST by iowamark
And who’s to stop anybody from simply buying two bars to make up for the smaller one?
The stupidity boggles the mind.
Proof positive that there never has been life on Mars.
Un... freaking... believable.
Clever way to boost sales. Bet the new 'size' is the same price. Mars- Michelle's Autocratic Regulatory Stooge.
Let’s put Mars on a financial diet and stop buying their products. Plus I guarantee they will not lower price to reflect less quantity.
By buying into this health agenda mars is essentially saying their product is junk and bad for you. Stupidity beyond comprehension
Well, thank GOD for Michelle Obama.....LOL
This is a red hearing. They are reducing the size to save money. It’s the same as many other products that have shrunk over the past few years: less produce, same price.
This is a PR dream that provides cover for something that they wanted to do for quite some time, but now they have a feel-good excuse rather than an image as a greedy company only interested in profits. It’s for the children and health in general you know...
And if mars really was concerned about our health, they would stop all those advertisements for stickers. Heck if they were really compassionate they would stop making that poison at all.
Or more easily changing the product label to indicate that it now represents “two servings”
That should read Snickers....not stickers
No more government approved Mars bars for me. They’re on my do not buy list.
“We have a responsibility to help our consumers and the pets they love lead healthy lives,”
...you do? If that really is the case, why didn’t they realize this sooner and sell broccoli bars? “Packed with broccoli! Broccoli Bars really satisfy”.
Bad news coming, thought Winston. And sure enough, following on a gory description of the annihilation of a Eurasian army, with stupendous figures of killed and prisoners, came the announcement that, as from next week, the chocolate ration would be reduced from thirty grammes to twenty....
As for the third message, it referred to a very simple error which could be set right in a couple of minutes. As short a time ago as February, the Ministry of Plenty had issued a promise (a 'categorical pledge' were the official words) that there would be no reduction of the chocolate ration during 1984. Actually, as Winston was aware, the chocolate ration was to be reduced from thirty grammes to twenty at the end of the present week. All that was needed was to substitute for the original promise a warning that it would probably be necessary to reduce the ration at some time in April.
...
It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grammes a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grammes a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours?
Most likely Mars was planning on dropping the candy bar size again (but Ben "Inky" Bernanke will remind us that there is no inflation), but now get to make points with Michelle for meeting some dietary goals.
Agree - candy, coffee, ice cream - all the sizes started shrinking long ago.
We know better.
That bar that we used to buy for 5 cents now costs well over a buck and is heading rapidly to 2 bucks.
But you can still buy a decent candy bar, in fact quite a nice one, for a dime - if it is a Mercury dime (worth about $2.43) and you buy the bar at your local coin dealer.
Will I be shot or arrested if I buy 2 of these downsized bars???????
Less food...same price...isn’t that inflation?
Agree - lets not give the Obama’s too much credit here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.