Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul R.

I saw that long list, too, but who has time to research it all. There is context to consider with most, if not all, of those items. One example: the DOD dropped research on predator drones from their budget, so Santorum got an earmark to pay for continued research. These drones have come in handy in the WOT, but he is stuck with a bad reputation because this was one of his earmarks.


260 posted on 02/17/2012 2:15:19 PM PST by Lauren BaRecall (I declare for Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: Lauren BaRecall

A few of the votes, like the one you mention ARE understandable. And there are a couple others that I can go along with that may mean, as I’ve mentioned elsewhere, that I am not a 100% rock ribbed conservative. I can even understand (with some misgivings) his position on Spectre (basically he was asked to be a team player, as I understand it.)

My problem is that we have plenty of Santorum supporters on here who seem to have unlimited time to blast Newt, but little to none to explain in detail where Santorum stands with regard to his record on a great many issues. Newt, on the other hand, is a policy wonk who loves to disseminate his ideas publicly, and has for a long time. So I find that particularly on economic issues, I have a much better idea of where Newt is at (or has been), warts and all.


268 posted on 02/18/2012 11:40:20 PM PST by Paul R. (We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson