[Girlene]

To the 95% on this thread who are dissing every Rep. candidate except Newt, did you bother reading the article? If you go to the article, it does NOT match with what’s posted at the top of this thread.

It says Romney and Paul pulled out. THEN, CNN cancelled the debate, and, oh, by the way, Santorum won’t be participating either.

Whether it was Romney, then Paul, then Santorum.....or Paul, then Santorum, then Romney.....or whatever.....who cares.

[SecondAmendment]

> To the 95% on this thread who are dissing every Rep. candidate except Newt, did you bother reading the article?

Yes, did you ?

Santorum "has no plans of doing it right now," spokesman Hogan Gidley said of the March 1 debate.

Hmm ... no mention of the order of who cancelled first, or who had prior knowledge of other withdrawals.

All we know for certain from the article is that the only candidate who agreed to show up for the debate was NEWT, everyone else were too busy to bother with the debate, period, end of story.

This is particularly bizarre, since Ron Paul will talk to ANYONE, at ANYTIME, about ANYTHING, including himself.

[Hawthorn]

>> did you bother reading the article? <<

Hey, don’t spoil our fun and games! We’d don’t need to read no stinkin’ article. We’d much rather bash Santorum without knowing the facts!

[Republican Wildcat]

To the 95% on this thread who are dissing every Rep. candidate except Newt, did you bother reading the article? If you go to the article, it does NOT match with what’s posted at the top of this thread. It says Romney and Paul pulled out. THEN, CNN cancelled the debate, and, oh, by the way, Santorum won’t be participating either. Whether it was Romney, then Paul, then Santorum.....or Paul, then Santorum, then Romney.....or whatever.....who cares.

Facts aren't relevant to many...it's what you "feel" that matters.

"Feelings...nothing more than feelings..."