[1rudeboy]

And finally, we get to "anyone who demonstrates I am incorrect must be a troll." I'm surprised it took so long.

I think the source of your confusion is your assumption that, when people run-out of unemployment they stop looking for work, "disappearing" them from the calculation of the unemployment rate. Your problem is that not all of them do, and you don't know how many continue looking.

So the notion that there will be a "spike" in the unemployment rate as a result of the extension of unemployment compensation is unproven, and unprovable. And I demonstrated why.

[Brown Deer]

And finally, we get to "anyone who demonstrates I am incorrect must be a troll." I'm surprised it took so long.

took so long? not the first time, I've called you out, loser.

I think the source of your confusion is your assumption that, when people run-out of unemployment they stop looking for work, "disappearing" them from the calculation of the unemployment rate.

I'm not at all confused. It's you who is confused.

Your problem is that not all of them do, and you don't know how many continue looking.

Why would you think that is my problem?

So the notion that there will be a "spike" in the unemployment rate as a result of the extension of unemployment compensation is unproven, and unprovable.

Actually it is.

And I demonstrated why.

You've only demonstrated your stupidity.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Unemployment calculations and the difference between sucrose and HFCS catch an unbelievable number of goofy comments.
You’re right, no matter how many times you explain it, the same clowns make the same mistakes, over and over.