Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I don’t know Adelson’s views on online, either.

But in my mind it’s Rick’s views that count...let’s say Adelson does oppose it online, for business reasons.

But Rick is opposed to gambling, period, for moral and societal reasons.

I, too, am opposed to gambling but I have been outvoted. That’s something I can’t overcome, can I?

Rick would overcome it, if he had the ability.

Online or anywhere.

On another post I asked if he might make an exception for Catholic bingo...

:o)


22 posted on 02/16/2012 8:25:35 AM PST by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR" - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: txrangerette

It raises red flags and leaves him open to attack.

Concern for those who gamble could place gambling into a health care issue of addiction, neglect, abuse, housing (not enough food for the children, beating up your wife/husband, losing your home). It’s the Left’s playground — control.

Santorum can say gambling causes problems (it does) but he should not state it should be limited.


27 posted on 02/16/2012 8:40:40 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson