Science isn't conducted by consensus so there's your first problem - and a solid explanation for why AGW is a hoax. On the other hand, we have decades of experience, and reams of evidence, that proves vaccinations decrease mortality and have successfully eliminated, or significantly reduced, diseases that for centuries have ravaged humanity.
Contrary to your other ridiculous point, "big pharma" (that's such a stupid label) does not make "huge money" on vaccinations. Only someone with no grasp of the industry believes such stupidity. Vaccines against some diseases are difficult to obtain because the profit, or lack thereof, doesn't justify production.
Global warming is junk science that is advocated by people who don't know jack squat, or have a financial or political interest at stake. The anti-vaccination crowd is simply made up of people who refuse to see the mountain of evidence in front of them that shows, clearly, they have no idea what they're talking about.
Since consensus is exactly how the dangers of modern vaccines are dismissed, despite evidence to the contrary and at great professional peril if one seeks to display this evidence, and you don’t understand that, your credibility suffers.
Since you don’t know what you’re talking about in terms of the $ to be made (making sure kids are seen for their shots every 6 months keeps pediatricians in business, for example), your credibility suffers some more.
Since you think I claimed vaccines don’t do good, which I never said, your use of straw arguments now has your credibility in need of morphine. Please seek a vaccine against piss-poor debate skills and come back later.