Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C. Edmund Wright
I think you are being fair, but I don't think you are taking into account all of Gingrich's votes when you compare their votes. Gingrich has some doozies in his background.

How about cosponsoring an economy0-destroying environmental bill with Nancy Pelosi in 1989. That bill alone should disqualify him for running for dog catcher as a Republican. And there was no reason for him to do it. No pressure from the caucus. That bill was way way ahead of it's time. The fact that he would cosponsor that communistic bill for no reason is a major black mark against him. I can't think of a single excuse why he'd be party to that.

63 posted on 02/15/2012 1:00:25 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

There are some problems in his voting record, but it is statistically slightly more conservative than Santorums - which is ironic - because many of Santorum’s followers and Santorum himself wants folks to believe he is actually far more conservative than Newt. That’s my main point with that.

And Santorum did get more and more liberal the longer he stayed in congress (first the House then the senate).


95 posted on 02/15/2012 2:01:41 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson