The judge only rejected Orly’s evidence - that was in the section:
“Evidentiary Arguments of Plaintiffs Farrar, et al.”
The other two plaintiffs were rejected because the judge disagreed with the “NBC = two citizen parents”. That is the next section:
“II. Application of the “Natural Born Citizen” Requirement
Do you think these things through before posting?? Why would the birth certificate be rejected in Orly's case but accepted in the other??
The other two plaintiffs were rejected because the judge disagreed with the NBC = two citizen parents.
... except that the judge had no legal precedent to go by, just misinterpreted dicta.