Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sick1
Thanks for the Nevada figure - 50.1% is, indeed, a majority (even if barely so). But Nevada was a caucus - not a primary election. But, checking the figures he took 46% in Florida's election, and I'll concede that is "close to" a majority.

I agree with most of what you have posted (I don't think I would caracterize 40% of the party as "extreme", but that's semantics). I have my doubts that Romney can succeed in energizing the base; but, with a world-class effort, it is not impossible. And if the Obama team comes up with more disasters like the contraception debacle, he may significantly contribute to Romney's efforts in energizing the republican base.

35 posted on 02/15/2012 8:11:10 AM PST by In Maryland ("Truth? We don't need no stinkin' truth!" - Official Motto of the Main Stream Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: In Maryland

The %ages may vary - but either way I don’t mean extreme like it’s a bad thing. My reasons for supporting Romney over Newt and Santorum are not because I prefer Romney’s ideology. I’d take a solid conservative that could win. I just believe Santorum and Newt are fatally flawed in many ways and not good representatives on the conservative ideology for a presidential election.

I think Romney can do a world class excite the base effort. I hope he’s smart enough to know that he has to. The base is teaching him quite a lesson making him crawl over glass to get the nomination. That’ll leave him resenting or reaching out.


36 posted on 02/15/2012 10:36:48 AM PST by sick1 (Don't fear the freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson