[christianhomeschoolmommaof3]

It’s a fact that no male should be left alone with a non biological child?!? If so, you contradict yourself in the rest of your post. Cherry said NO male should be left with a non bio child and that is outrageous. No wonder so many men on this site are rabid women haters with posts like cherry’s

[My hearts in London - Everett]

"No wonder so many men on this site are rabid women haters"

I'd say that's a pretty "outrageous" and rabid statement right there.... How demeaning and insulting to the men here on Free Republic!

[christianhomeschoolmommaof3]

In post #6 Cherry said this ‘I'm sorry to say this but males have no business babysitting children that are not their own....not that women can't be horrid as well...I just think the stakes are too high to have non biologically attached males around children...”

I said this in post #71 ‘No wonder so many men on this site are rabid women haters with posts like cherry’s’

I would like to post a correction for all to see. I should have said....
No wonder SOME men on this site are rabid women haters with posts like Cherry's.

The argument has become about my choice of words. I did not mean that there are alot of men on this site that are women haters. There are some men on this site that do hate women. They usually post in the family court/child support threads.

The debate became about my choice of words and the original intent of my post was lost. The original intent was to state that I can NOW understand some men's hatred of women especially when someone (cherry) says they can't be trusted with children.

My post was framed as an attack on the men of FR but that was not the intent. It was intended as a defense. If anyone else thought that I attacked the men on this site I apologize. I am TIRED of the attack on men in this country!!!!

I would also like to apologize the ‘My hearts in London -Everett’ for the argument we have had on this thread.

Blessings to you all!