[Pollster1]

The only acceptable option is for about half of the organizations that provide “accommodations, facilities, advantages, privileges, services, or goods related to the solemnization or celebration of a marriage” to go out of business. Decent people in Washington State who want to get married may have a choice between crossing state lines and going to a facility that supports sham marriage. I would cross state lines rather than solemnize a marriage in a church that had been voluntarily desecrated.

[gidget7]

I have been saying for the longest time, in areas where this blaspheme is “legal”, Churches, all of them, need to state clearly and for all to see, the term “Holy Matrimony” is the only type of ceremonies they perform. The should encourage parishioners to use the Church facilities for receptions. Homosexuals cannot hijack that term.

Actually, I would love to see them Holy Matrimony over completely, requirements and registration being at the Churches discretion NOT the state, and no need for licenses!

Get ready for the almost immediate issuance of all so called marriage licenses to ask for partner a and partner b, no more husband and wife, no more bride and groom.