Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: katiedidit1

Please note that the last of those occured in 1997. It’s the stuff he did since then that has many concerned. I’m not typing this to change minds, simply to point out why Santorum’s positives are much higher than Gingrich’s at the moment.


55 posted on 02/12/2012 10:46:06 PM PST by Ingtar ("But it is hard to maintain an aura of invincibility after you have been vinced..." Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Ingtar
Santorum’s positives

Deliberately lying about Newt for his own gain is not what I consider a positive. You may since you support him. No matter what he'll never get my vote. Liars for their own gain are repulsive to me. He has a lot in common with mitt with their deliberately lying to American voters - and that's not conservative nor patriotism. So whatever he 'says' is coming out of a lying heart/mouth.

63 posted on 02/12/2012 11:35:12 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson