Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Qbert
Mr. Lew said insurers would cover the cost because it’s more expensive to pay for pregnancies than contraception.

But the pregnancy leads to a birth and another covered person for the insurance company, therefore the insurance company gets to collect more money. So, is this statement really true. Don't insurance companies make more when they cover more people?

16 posted on 02/12/2012 8:15:23 PM PST by MulberryDraw (Anyone see the democrat budget yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MulberryDraw

In general, they only collect more premium when a couple moves to family status after their first child is born.

This is just more evidence that, to liberals, human beings are just parasites on this earth and even for each other. They view each new life as a “net cost” to society instead of a valuable contributor to it. They don’t understand that if our nation keeps killing babies and contracepting itself to the point that we have less than 2 children per couple, we are placing the burden of Social Secruity and Medicare on fewer and fewer people. We need more young people to pay the bills that this administration is running up, not less.


26 posted on 02/12/2012 8:27:59 PM PST by VinceASA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson