Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WilliamIII

I liked Jeff Bridges but Brolin and a few others spoke unnaturally formal for their characters. Didn’t fit. And the girl was okay but not great as an actress. People wanted to love the movie and I think that was part of the hype.


10 posted on 02/11/2012 7:47:29 PM PST by Lizavetta (You get what you tolerate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lizavetta

I agree; including Glenn Campbell’s character. His speech sounded like he thought he might be in a Shakespeare play. But because of The Duke, the original was better.

He and Kate Hepburn were great in Rooster Cogburn, too. In fact, I’d put Grit and Rooster side-by-side.


28 posted on 02/11/2012 8:20:14 PM PST by Tucker39 ( Psa 68:19Blessed be the Lord, who daily loadeth us with benefits; even the God of our salvation.KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Lizavetta

From what I understand, the “formal” language seen in the Coen movie was put in because it is closer to the novel...in reality, it is truer to how people would have spoken at the time...a look at the letters from that time period shows that even the least educated (by today’s standards; they didn’t go beyond 8th grade usually) spoke and wrote MUCH better than most students today.


40 posted on 02/11/2012 8:51:54 PM PST by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Lizavetta
I personally thought Josh Brolin was straining the whole movie to do His best Bruce Dern impression. JMHO

CC

51 posted on 02/11/2012 9:14:06 PM PST by Celtic Conservative (Wisdom comes from experience. Experience comes from a lack of wisdom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson