“...Why did you clip out what he was under investigation for?...”
-
george76 did not say...
freddd did not say...
So here it is:
“The investigation includes whether Nagin received favors or items of value from vendors to the city in return for contracts they received while Nagin was in office, the source said.”
See how easy that is?
Thanks. One of my pet peeves. If someone can’t be bothered to post the meat and gist of the article then they shouldn’t post at all. Let someone more thoughtful do it.