Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caww

Unless Jim was in the audience at CPAC, I see nowhere in my post where he was brought up, or the need to. I know who he endorsed and I also know that he wasn’t singing the same tune just six months ago, but I don’t hold that against him.

Again, I could post Newt’s own words, but that’s not good enough for those who can only repeat the latest campaign-issued talking points and easily disregard his past as “mistakes”. I also know posting Newt’s own words and deeds here is considered “trashing Newt” and sends many of his rabid supporters into a foaming-at-the-mouth rage since they cannot explain his “mistakes” away effectively.


77 posted on 02/11/2012 12:47:20 PM PST by RasterMaster ("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: RasterMaster
I will say again....Not one of the candidates running can say they've been "EFFECTIVE" in successfully implementing conservativism for our country as Newt has accomplished. Not one........Most would very much rather have an "Effective" President for conservativism than one who carries the name but is un-effective. Newt has addressed all the "baggage" issues sufficient for many....those who still bring it up are simply doing so because they have another candidate in mind...just as you are for Santorum.....

Most recognize Newt's on a mission and more than willing to go against whoever he has to to get our country back on track and moving forward again...and this without concerns for "other" political advancement, which Santorum most definately has and he will step on and over people to attain that.

Santorum's from my state so I am all too familiar with the likes of how he operates....further the following descriptions are from the people in my State that worked directly with Santorum who know Santorum best politically and professionally":

extreme”,... “big government”,... “pork barrel spender”,... “hair trigger volatility”,... “cruel”,... “extremely arrogant”, ...“dismissive”,... “massive ego”,.... lack of character,... poor temperament, ...“unfit”, ...“He treats people really badly with arrogance and contempt”, ...multiple personas,.. vindictive,... nasty,... “a disaster”,... “abrasive”, ...“absurd”,... “phony”,... “rigid”,... “divisive”,.... “a sure victory for Obama”.

http://hillbuzz.org/why-rick-santorums-pennsylvania-residency-scam-and-school-tuition-fraud-still-matters-and-why-he-cant-be-the-nominee-because-of-it-95754

97 posted on 02/11/2012 9:46:36 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson