[C. Edmund Wright]

I will write slower so you can follow what I’m saying, because clearly you have no clue to this point.

I am not blaming Rick for losing 06. It was not winnable for a lot of reasons. I totally agree with that. Now, follow me close here —

I blame Rick NOT for the reality of 06, I blame Rick for the bullish-t he is telling in 2012 about how he ran 06. He did NOT run a conservative campaign. He panicked and jettisoned conservatism faster than Karl Rove in a swing state in a feckless attempt to try and convince folks that little Rickie “can be a good moderate too.”

Google his “50 Things You May Not Know About Rick Santorum” which was put out by HIS own campaign in 06.

[hoosiermama]

Yelp it's not the action, it's the lying about the action that gets politicians in trouble every time...When will they learn?

[ncalburt]

Your personal attacks on Rick are overrun the top and cool with the snide comments about me if you don’t want the admin involved real quick .
Your memory of 2006 is wrong it was The Mark Foley election surprise which Are
The facts

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

The reason we will lose this election is, mostly based on the fact that there is no stability among our side. Hell, they can't stay with a candidate any longer than a few days, or a week tops.

This not only reveals how weak this voting block is, it also shows how ignorant most of the voters in regards to the facts or details about the candidates, truly is.

You are absolutely correct about Santorum, but you get viciously attacked for rightfully pointing it out, complete with history and documentation to back up your information about him. I can say that I have fully investigated Santorum and find the same alarming things from his past, but I have also been attacked for pointing his many contradictions, out to the forum.

This blind, impulsive stampede and Lemming mentality will only prove to ruin us later. It always does.