Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

A limited, very limited, conflict would be good for Assad, and would limit criticism from other Arab states. Wonder whose side Barry will be on?

17 posted on 02/09/2012 4:02:24 PM PST by SJackson (The Pilgrims Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson

An unlimited, humiliating ass-whupping of Assad would be very bad for him, though. Why should there be a Syrian Golan Heights? It’s higher than the Israeli side, and therefor is important. Friend of mine temporarily occupied it in ‘73, and the snow and cold was more deadly than the Syrians.


18 posted on 02/09/2012 4:06:57 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson