Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor; American Constitutionalist

Heh - well, this thread is probably pretty well dead. I’ve seen multiple posts of that list, but what I don’t see is much in the way of successful refutation of it. I’m still open to either candidate, but that lack of specifics in a defense of Santorum is troubling. With defenses of Newt, one often gets specifics, sometimes from Newt. And he sometimes admits “I screwed up”. I can (mostly) live with that.

A-C: Typically, questions about Santorum are replied to with attacks on Newt. A-C, or other Santorum supporters (if you are listening), I find that unhelpful. The subject is Santorum, when the question(s) is(are), “why did RS vote for X, Y, or Z?” I have seen only a few of those questions answered / votes defended.


75 posted on 02/13/2012 9:07:38 AM PST by Paul R. (We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Paul R.

FR is loaded with RNC and Obummer shills, and Jim’s zot machine can only get them when they blow their own cover. So, Newt and Sarah will always be the targets of the hate.


76 posted on 02/13/2012 9:27:10 AM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson