Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rome2000
[Santorum is] a lawyer

Humorous, but not a valid criticism.

He voted against right to work (Siding with the unions to force workers to belong and pay dues against their will)

A legitimate and serious criticism. How could someone who claims to be conservative do such a thing? This is a very important issue, and it's absolutely mind-boggling and inexplicable that Santorum could be so terribly misguided on the issue.

He endorsed Specter over Toomey. Specter switched parties and was a deciding vote in the Senate for Obamacare

A valid criticism, though not as serious as the union issue.

Can’t even win reelection in his own state

It's true that, as an incumbent Senator, Santorum lost by a huge margin, and it does give one pause when trying to evaluate overall electability in the general election.

While I can overlook some of the issues with Santorum, of the ones you cite, the one which is most disturbing is his absurd opposition to "right to work". I just don't get it, and I would appreciate it if some Santorum supporter could calmly explain such an apparent anti-conservative aberration.

I could go on.

I'm aware of some other valid criticisms of Santorum, such as his many votes in favor of continued and/or expanded funding for a myriad of dubious federal agencies and programs.

I am going to give Rick a closer look, but his apparent submission to union interests is a gigantic red flag to me at the moment.

At this juncture, I just don't feel that Santorum has all the necessary ingredients for a successful Presidential run. I just don't see him as a formidable enough opponent against 0bama.

But I'll keep watching and give him some fair consideration...

70 posted on 02/09/2012 1:38:44 AM PST by sargon (I don't like the sound of these "boncentration bamps")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: sargon

You can’t get a pure conservative from every part of the country. I doubt Santorum could have been elected in PA if he didn’t support the unions at that time. From his point-of-view, it’s better to cede one issue and be able to push his other policies rather than let a Democrat get in who would back 100% liberal policies.


100 posted on 02/09/2012 10:22:55 AM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson