In the overall race, Romney leads in popular vote with almost 7.9 million votes or over 48% of the entiree popular vote to date. Santorum (now out of the race) is second with almost 3.8 million votes or 23%. Gingrich (now out of the race) is third with 2.6 million votes or 16%, and Ron Paul (now out of the active race) is fourth with 1.8 million votes or 11%. With the Texas win and a total now of 1,182 committed delegates, Romney has has won 66.2% of the total delegates awarded to date. Santorum follows with 16.8%, Gingrich with 8.5% and Paul with 8.3%.
Once again, in my opinion, the entire tough primary season has strengthen all of the candidates, and particularly now, the GOP nominee, Mitt Romney. It has kept the GOP message at the top of the news cycleand prepared for the contest with Obama, which is now ongoing as the contest for President, Mitt Romney (GOP) vs. Barack Obama (DNC).
Here's the GOP Tracking results as of Tuesday, May 30, 2012:
| 2012 GOP Primaries | Mitt Romney | Newt Gingrich | Rick Santorum | Ron Paul | Ron Huntsman | Rick Perry | Michele Bachman | Herman Cain | Totals | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| State | Date | Votes | % | Del's | Win | Votes | % | Del's | Win | Votes | % | Del's | Win | Votes | % | Del's | Win | Votes | % | Del's | Votes | % | Del's | Votes | % | Del's | Votes | % | Del's | Votes | Del's |
| Iowa | 1/3/2012 | 29,805 | 24.58% | 7 | - | 16,163 | 13.33% | 2 | - | 29,839 | 24.61% | 8 | 1 | 26,036 | 21.47% | 7 | - | 739 | 0.61% | 0 | 12,557 | 10.36% | 0 | 6,046 | 4.99% | 0 | 58 | 0.05% | 0 | 121,243 | 23 |
| New Hamp | 1/10/2012 | 97,591 | 39.74% | 8 | 1 | 23,421 | 9.54% | 0 | - | 23,432 | 9.54% | 0 | - | 56,872 | 23.16% | 3 | - | 41,964 | 17.04% | 2 | 1,764 | 0.72% | 0 | 350 | 0.14% | 0 | 160 | 0.07% | 0 | 245,554 | 12 |
| South Caro | 1/21/2012 | 167,297 | 27.82% | 2 | - | 243,172 | 40.43% | 23 | 1 | 102,061 | 16.97% | 0 | - | 78,362 | 13.03% | 0 | - | 1,173 | 0.19% | 0 | 2,534 | 0.42% | 0 | 491 | 0.08% | 0 | 6,326 | 1.05% | 0 | 601,416 | 25 |
| Florida | 1/31/2012 | 775,014 | 46.45% | 50 | 2 | 533,177 | 31.95% | 0 | - | 223,799 | 13.35% | 0 | - | 117,104 | 7.02% | 0 | - | 6,199 | 0.37% | 0 | 6,773 | 0.41% | 0 | 3,967 | 0.24% | 0 | 3,492 | 0.21% | 0 | 1,668,525 | 50 |
| Nevada | 2/4/2012 | 16,486 | 50.12% | 14 | 3 | 6,956 | 21.15% | 6 | - | 3,277 | 9.96% | 3 | - | 6,175 | 18.77% | 5 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 32,894 | 28 |
| Main | 2,373 | 38.45% | 0 | 4 | 405 | 6.56% | 0 | - | 1,136 | 18.41% | 0 | - | 2,258 | 36.58% | 21 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 6,172 | 19 | |
| Colorado | 2/7/2012 | 23,012 | 34.96% | 13 | - | 8,445 | 12.83% | 2 | - | 26,614 | 40.43% | 17 | 2 | 7,759 | 11.79% | 1 | - | 46 | 0.07% | 0 | 52 | 0.08% | 0 | 27 | 0.04% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 65,955 | 36 |
| Minnesota | 8,096 | 16.97% | 2 | - | 5,134 | 10.76% | 1 | - | 21,436 | 44.94% | 12 | 1 | 13,030 | 27.32% | 22 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 47,696 | 40 | |
| Missouri | 63,826 | 26.24% | 0 | - | 9,859 | 4.05% | 0 | - | 138,957 | 57.12% | 0 | 4 | 30,641 | 12.59% | 0 | - | 1,045 | 0.42% | 0 | 2,463 | 0.98% | 0 | 1,690 | 0.67% | 0 | 2,314 | 0.92% | 0 | 250,795 | 0 | |
| Arizona | 2/28/2012 | 216,805 | 47.99% | 29 | 5 | 74,110 | 16.40% | 0 | - | 122,088 | 27.03% | 0 | - | 38,753 | 8.58% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1,871 | 0.41% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 453,627 | 29 |
| Michigan | 409,899 | 42.34% | 16 | 6 | 65,016 | 6.72% | 0 | - | 377,521 | 38.99% | 14 | - | 115,712 | 11.95% | 0 | - | 1,726 | 0.18% | 0 | 1,906 | 0.20% | 0 | 1,762 | 0.18% | 0 | 1,241 | 0.13% | 0 | 974,783 | 30 | |
| Washington | 3/3/2012 | 19,111 | 37.65% | 25 | 7 | 5,221 | 10.28% | 0 | - | 12,089 | 23.81% | 7 | - | 12,594 | 24.81% | 8 | - | 924 | 1.82% | 0 | 437 | 0.86% | 0 | 198 | 0.39% | 0 | 190 | 0.37% | 0 | 50,764 | 43 |
| Wyoming | 822 | 38.99% | 23 | 8 | 165 | 7.83% | 1 | - | 673 | 31.93% | 3 | - | 439 | 20.83% | 3 | - | 3 | 0.14% | 0 | 2 | 0.09% | 0 | 2 | 0.09% | 0 | 2 | 0.09% | 0 | 2,108 | 29 | |
| Alaska | 3/6/2012 | 4,285 | 32.52% | 8 | 9 | 1,856 | 14.09% | 2 | - | 3,860 | 29.30% | 8 | - | 3,175 | 24.10% | 6 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 13,176 | 27 |
| Georgia | S | 233,297 | 26.12% | 21 | - | 424,976 | 47.57% | 52 | 2 | 176,080 | 19.71% | 3 | - | 58,982 | 6.60% | 0 | - | 1,812 | 0.20% | 0 | 1,694 | 0.19% | 0 | 1,712 | 0.19% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 898,553 | 76 |
| Idaho | u | 27,514 | 61.61% | 32 | 10 | 940 | 2.11% | 0 | - | 8,115 | 18.17% | 0 | - | 8,086 | 18.11% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 44,655 | 32 |
| Massachusetts | p | 265,110 | 73.36% | 41 | 11 | 16,990 | 4.70% | 0 | - | 44,255 | 12.25% | 0 | - | 35,037 | 9.70% | 0 | - | 2,248 | 0.61% | 0 | 1,024 | 0.28% | 0 | 913 | 0.25% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 365,577 | 41 |
| N. Dakota | e | 2,691 | 23.71% | 7 | - | 961 | 8.48% | 2 | - | 4,510 | 39.74% | 11 | 5 | 3,186 | 28.07% | 8 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 11,349 | 28 |
| Ohio | r | 456,513 | 37.94% | 40 | 12 | 175,554 | 14.59% | 0 | - | 446,225 | 37.08% | 21 | - | 111,238 | 9.24% | 4 | - | 6,428 | 0.53% | 0 | 7,445 | 0.62% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1,203,403 | 66 |
| Oklahoma | 80,291 | 28.34% | 14 | - | 78,686 | 27.77% | 13 | - | 96,759 | 34.15% | 14 | 6 | 27,572 | 9.73% | 0 | - | 749 | 0.26% | 0 | 1,290 | 0.45% | 0 | 951 | 0.33% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 286,298 | 43 | |
| Tennessee | T | 154,911 | 28.59% | 19 | - | 132,072 | 24.38% | 9 | - | 205,012 | 37.84% | 29 | 7 | 49,782 | 9.21% | 2 | - | 1,230 | 0.22% | 0 | 1,953 | 0.36% | 0 | 1,874 | 0.34% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 546,853 | 55 |
| Vermont | u | 23,965 | 40.84% | 9 | 13 | 4,944 | 8.42% | 0 | - | 13,401 | 24.39% | 4 | - | 14,407 | 24.55% | 4 | - | 1,210 | 2.00% | 0 | 543 | 0.90% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 60,438 | 17 |
| Virginia | e | 158,053 | 59.52% | 43 | 14 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 107,480 | 40.48% | 3 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 265,533 | 49 |
| Guam | 3/10/2012 | 215 | 100% | 9 | 15 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 215 | 9 |
| N. Mariana Is | 738 | 87.03% | 9 | 16 | 29 | 3.42% | 0 | - | 27 | 3.18% | 0 | - | 54 | 6.37% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 848 | 9 | |
| Virgin Is | 132 | 46.32% | 7 | 17 | 18 | 6.32% | 0 | - | 23 | 8.07% | 0 | - | 112 | 39.30% | 1 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 848 | 9 | |
| Kansas | 6,250 | 21.11% | 7 | - | 4,298 | 14.52% | 0 | - | 15,290 | 51.65% | 33 | 8 | 3,767 | 12.72% | 0 | - | 38 | 0.13% | 0 | 37 | 0.12% | 0 | 16 | 0.05% | 0 | 39 | 0.13% | 0 | 29,735 | 40 | |
| Alabama | 3/13/2012 | 180,250 | 29.65% | 12 | - | 182,197 | 29.79% | 13 | - | 214,545 | 35.29% | 22 | 9 | 30,892 | 5.08% | 0 | - | 1,044 | 0.17% | 0 | 1,866 | 0.30% | 0 | 1,695 | 0.28% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 612,489 | 50 |
| Am. Somoa | 57 | 81.43% | 9 | 18 | 2 | 2.86% | 0 | - | 6 | 8.57% | 0 | - | 5 | 7.14% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 70 | 9 | |
| Hawaii | 4,250 | 45.38% | 12 | 19 | 1,034 | 11.04% | 0 | - | 2,369 | 25.30% | 5 | - | 1,712 | 18.28% | 3 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 9,365 | 20 | |
| Mississippi | 88,715 | 30.93% | 13 | - | 90,409 | 31.52% | 12 | - | 94,981 | 33.11% | 13 | 10 | 12,749 | 4.44% | 0 | - | 409 | 0.14% | 0 | 1,337 | 0.46% | 0 | 954 | 0.33% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 289,554 | 40 | |
| Missouri Cauc | 3/17/2012 | 1,623 | 26,16% | 7 | - | 460 | 7.42% | 0 | - | 3,397 | 54.96% | 12 | - | 723 | 11.66% | 4 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 6,203 | 52 |
| Puerto Rico | 3/18/2024 | 93,375 | 88.01% | 12 | 23 | 2,431 | 2.17% | 0 | - | 9,524 | 8.52% | 0 | - | 1,452 | 1.30% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 111,782 | 23 |
| Illinois | 3/20/2012 | 433,700 | 46.87% | 45 | 21 | 73,993 | 8.00% | 0 | - | 325,488 | 35.18% | 12 | - | 86,605 | 9.36% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 5,541 | 0.60% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 925,327 | 69 |
| Louisiana | 3/24/2012 | 49,749 | 27.04% | 12 | - | 29,655 | 16.12% | 0 | - | 91,205 | 49.63% | 26 | 11 | 11,460 | 6.23% | 0 | - | 242 | 0.13% | 0 | 955 | 0.52% | 0 | 622 | 0.34% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 183,988 | 46 |
| DC | 4/3/2012 | 3,122 | 70.22% | 18 | 22 | 477 | 10.73% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 535 | 12.03% | 0 | - | 312 | 7.02% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 4,446 | 19 |
| Maryland | 117,527 | 49.43% | 37 | 23 | 26,088 | 10.97% | 0 | - | 69,020 | 29.03% | 0 | - | 22,698 | 9.55% | 0 | - | 1,393 | 0.59% | 0 | 1,037 | 0.44% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 237,763 | 37 | |
| Wisconsin | 346,279 | 44.40% | 33 | 24 | 45,944 | 5.98% | 0 | - | 288,648 | 37.01% | 9 | - | 87,896 | 11.27% | 0 | - | 5,133 | 0.66% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 6,054 | 0.78% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 779,9545 | 42 | |
| Conn | 4/24/2012 | 40,265 | 68.84% | 28 | 25 | 6,135 | 10.49% | 0 | - | 4,078 | 6.97% | 0 | - | 8,013 | 13.70% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 58,492 | 28 |
| Deleware | 16,143 | 56.46% | 17 | 26 | 7,741 | 27.07% | 0 | - | 1,690 | 5.91% | 0 | - | 3,017 | 10.55% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 28,591 | 17 | |
| New York | 103,142 | 63.28% | 92 | 27 | 20,720 | 12.71% | 1 | - | 14,181 | 8.70% | 0 | - | 24,947 | 15.31% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 162,990 | 95 | |
| Pennsylvania | 464,062 | 58.01% | 69 | 28 | 83,795 | 10.47% | 0 | - | 146,745 | 18.34% | 0 | - | 105,356 | 13.17% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 799,958 | 72 | |
| Rhode Il. | 9,156 | 63.95% | 15 | 29 | 878 | 6.13% | 0 | - | 823 | 5.75% | 0 | - | 3,462 | 24.18% | 4 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 14,319 | 28 | |
| Indiana | 5/8/2012 | 413,717 | 64.67% | 27 | 30 | 41,087 | 6.42% | 0 | - | 85,255 | 13.33% | 0 | - | 99,628 | 15.57% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 46 |
| N. Carolina | 634,667 | 69.27% | 36 | 31 | 73,857 | 8.06% | 4 | - | 100,633 | 10.98% | 6 | - | 107,077 | 11.69% | 6 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 55 | |
| West Virginia | 77,081 | 70.35% | 31 | 32 | 6,962 | 6.35% | 0 | - | 13,341 | 12.18% | 0 | - | 12,184 | 11.12% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 31 | |
| Nebraska | 5/15/2012 | 129,771 | 70.86% | 35 | 33 | 9,540 | 5.21% | 0 | - | 25,613 | 13.99% | 0 | - | 18,222 | 9.95% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 183,146 | 35 |
| Oregon | 196,460 | 72.24% | 25 | 34 | 14,856 | 5.46% | 0 | - | 25,825 | 9.50% | 1 | - | 34,812 | 12.80% | 2 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 271,953 | 28 | |
| Arkansas | 5/22/2012 | 102,931 | 68.30% | 31 | 35 | 7,426 | 4.93% | 0 | - | 20,101 | 13.34% | 0 | - | 20,239 | 13.43% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 150,697 | 31 |
| Kentucky | 117,396 | 70.92% | 42 | 36 | 10,445 | 6.31% | 0 | - | 15,654 | 9.46% | 0 | - | 22,044 | 13.32% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 165,539 | 45 | |
| Texas | 5/29/2012 | 993,894 | 70.53% | 105 | 37 | 67.704 | 4.80% | 7 | - | 114,617 | 8.13% | 12 | - | 171,923 | 12.20% | 18 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1,409,247 | 155 |
| California | 6/5/2012 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 177 |
| Montana | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 26 | |
| New Jersey | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 50 | |
| New Mexico | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 28 | |
| South Dakota | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 40 | |
| Utah | 6/26/2012 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | - | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 40 |
| Comm. @ lrg | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOTALS | 7,866,353 | 48.20% | 1,181 | 37 | 2,637,919 | 16.16% | 153 | 2 | 3,762,883 | 23.07% | 300 | 11 | 1,816,529 | 11.13% | 149 | 0 | 76,067 | 0.47% | 2 | 55,081 | 0.34% | 0 | 29,324 | 0.18% | 0 | 13,822 | 0.08% | 0 | 16,319,087 | 1,785 | |
| % Av. Award | Delegates | Romney | 66.16% | Gingrich | 8.57% | Santorum | 16.81% | Paul | 8.35% | Huntsman | 0.11% | Total % of delegates awarded: | 78.05% | 2,287 | |||||||||||||||||
Now that he has the endorsement of all of the major former candidates, and now that he has officially won enough delegates to ensure his nomination, I will support Mitt Romney for president against the abject marxist ideolog, Obama.
See: Why I will support Mitt Romney if he wins the GOP nomination.
Simply put, four more years of Obama's horrific leadership and fundamental change could easily put this nation in a economic, debt, foreign policy, and energy hole that we will have a very difficult and very painful time of digging our way out of. And then only at the cost of potentially decades of heavy burden placed on our children and grandchildren to reverse the trends and mechanisms Obama is putting in place.
Obama's continued actions indicate the abject need for him to be replaced. He and his cohorts attack the free market system and capitlization of businesses regularly as something bad, calling the leaders of those businesses out of touch with their workers and thus fostering class envy and strfe...when it is precisely those business leaders, looking to improve their bottom line and buisiness who are the engine for jobs and prosperity in this country.
Obama has gone so far to say that in so doing, people like Romney are "raping" the businesses they work with. Clearly, nothing could be further from the truth for a successful company like Bain Capitol. In over 80% of the cases, Bain has been successful in turning businesses around that were facing bankruptcy. For a company staring at the prospect of going under, those are pretty good odds and that is why they hire a company like Bain Capitol to help them. As a result, Bain has been a huge net increaser in jobs, prosperity, and wealth for hundreds of thosuands of Americans in all economic conditions.
Obama as President has not made a single net increase of one single job. INstead, he is the 1st US President in modern history to have had a net loss of jobs in his four year term as President.
It's precisely because he does not understand and even hates the free market system that this is so. He is left only to concentrate on the 20% of the time Bain did not succeed in an attempt to paint something that has been successful, as a failure. Well, in the free market, some companies go out of business and you cannot save them all. That's life. Turning the whole nation into a socialist hell-hole to try and avoid it is precisely the wrong answer, and yet is it what Obama has been attempting his entire presidency, increasing our debt by five trillion dollars in less than four years in a vain attempt to do so.
Obama has now also come out in open support of Gay and Lesbian marriages. He has been caught off-mic indicating to the Russian President that if they will just wait until the election is over and Obama wins, that he then be unconstrained by an election and be much more flexible with nuclear weapons agreements and missile defense agreements than he can be now.
Obama has also spoken improperly to the Supreme Court, attempting to influence their vote as they consider the constitutionality of Obama's Health Care program, indicating he would consider it Judicial Activism if they took the "unprecedented" action of over-turning this program which barely passed congress in 2010. What is unprecednted is a sitting president speaking this way to try and directly influence the Court while they are considering the constitutionality of his own program. He is abusing his executive power trying to influence a seperate branch of government, provided with constitutional oversight, to vote a particular way. In addition, his personal involvement in the Treyvon-Zimmerman case in Florida, shows once again him interfering in an ongoing, undecided legal matter, trying to influence it a particular way to gain political influence. Such cases must be decided through the legal process, and not through public opinion influenced by the press or the President.
Simply put, these are the acts of an individual wholly unprepared and unsuited for leadership at this level.
Once again, if you are so inclined, please let others know about this GOP Primary Tracker page and its analysis:
America at the Crossroads of History
(http://www.jeffhead.com/crossroads.htm)
Jeff Head
May 30, 2012