Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jane Long

That’s as bad as the ex-wife showing up for the interview on Newt. Ancient news. And no one bought the leftist ploy.


259 posted on 02/07/2012 7:39:25 PM PST by writer33 (Mark Levin Is The Constitutional Engine Of Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]


To: writer33

Hey that Santorum kid is doing pretty good in Middle America tonight.


277 posted on 02/07/2012 7:47:04 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

To: writer33
That’s as bad as the ex-wife showing up for the interview on Newt. Ancient news. And no one bought the leftist ploy.

That interview is actually what destroyed Newt.

People (even the media) have missed it because it didn't affect the South Carolina primary. It took time to propagate through women. But ever since, Newt's gender gap, which was already bad, has become a disaster.

295 posted on 02/07/2012 7:56:52 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

To: writer33; Jane Long; Strategerist
259 posted on Tuesday, February 07, 2012 9:39:25 PM by writer33: “That’s as bad as the ex-wife showing up for the interview on Newt. Ancient news. And no one bought the leftist ploy.”

I agree that dog won't hunt, but I'm not sure I agree on the parallels here. This isn't an attack on Newt Gingrich in any way, but rather pointing out that if the dog set on Gingrich won't hunt, the dog set on Santorum will hunt even less.

My understanding of the situation — and correct me if I'm wrong — is that Rick Santorum married a woman who had previously lived with an abortionist. Nobody is claiming personal misconduct on Rick Santorum’s part, and while I'm certainly not defending living with somebody outside of marriage, there's a difference between accusing a candidate of personal wrongdoing and accusing a candidate's wife of personal wrongdoing long before they were married.

I would have serious concerns about Santorum if I believed his wife was pro-choice. Wives can be and often are a clue to what their husbands actually believe outside of public view, or at least to what they're willing to tolerate even if they disagree. I don't know how much of the stuff about the private views of recent Republican first ladies is actually true, but there are reasons most of them kept their views quiet.

In Mrs. Santorum’s case, I think it's crystal clear to everybody, based on the Santorum family's subsequent willingness to have children that many and perhaps most Americans would have aborted and Mrs. Santorum’s willingness to give up her career to care for a special-needs child, that Mrs. Santorum’s repentance is genuine. Lots of “I have sinned” fake repentance claims are out there, but you just don't keep a Trisomony-18 special needs baby and give up your career to do so if you aren't serious about not just talking the talk but walking the walk.

976 posted on 02/08/2012 8:43:11 AM PST by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson