It's not my argument, it's what's in the record. If I understand the legal process correctly, she would have had to say "I object" when the document was admitted into evidence. Apparently, she didn't.
So Orly didn't say the Magic "open sesame" words? And we should take the legal system seriously? This is just more proof our current legal system is deserving of contempt.
It wasn't even HER case! How could she "object" to what was entered in someone else's case? The first two attorneys were quite insistent that she be separate from them.
Seriously, you are going to have to work on this explanation. The judge simply made a mistake in applying the evidence from one case (where it wasn't even claimed to be accurate) to another, separate case. Were it anyone but Obama, everyone could see how ridiculous it would be for a Judge to rely on "internet evidence."