[Lurking Libertarian]

How is that agreeing "that 0bama was born in Hawaii".

He moved the document into evidence. He was intending to use it to show that Obama's father was not a citizen, but once the document is in evidence, it's in evidence, and the judge can use any part of that document to support a finding.

[philman_36]

Even when nobody stated that it was "the real McCoy"?
The testimony was "...professed to be of Barack Hussein Obama II."
Since the Defendant didn't offer up the original document for comparison that was all that could be offered to the court.

[DiogenesLamp]

He moved the document into evidence. He was intending to use it to show that Obama's father was not a citizen, but once the document is in evidence, it's in evidence, and the judge can use any part of that document to support a finding.

The document was entered into evidence under the taint of forgery. The Judge should not be able to rule that a print out of an image file is legitimate proof of anything. This is nonsensical. If this was the standard of proof allowed, someone should have trotted out one of those Kenyan birth certificates floating around on the net.