Look, it's very simple. If you want to outlaw abortion and allow for an abortion/incest exception, you have to wrap up your dealings with the rapist before you can do the abortion.
I hope you understand that.
We might need to bring him back several times to do various tests just to make sure we have not got a false positive, or that he's got a twin, or triplet, or whatever. It could take months before we get to the point where he can be positively identified and then executed.
So, what if we made a mistake, and it's not his kid in there ~ our prohibition on abortion would apply. He might get off eh! Everybody walks away alive. However, if rape is a crime worth killing somebody, then we must logically kill the rapist first!
Hey in my “perfect world” rapists would be executed, and it would not take months or years.
If you were given a choice between abortion on demand remaining completely legal, even at tax payer expense or abortion being outlawed but with rape being one of very few exceptions, in which case the rape victim would be offered the “morning after pill” only once, in the ER once the rape is confirmed by a medical doctor and that was her only opportunity.....you would choose the first or the second scenario?