Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grunthor; Dr. Brian Kopp; trisham; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; Coleus; narses; Lesforlife; ...
No, they just would not be allowed protection under the rape exception in my scenario.

Okay, so on this thread you have opined that not allowing a rape victim to have an abortion is akin to "slavery" and you have stated that a fertilized egg IS NOT a person, but now you only want women who suffered from visibly violent rapes to have a rape exception?

Do you realize how inconsistent you are being?

Wow, I don’t think I’ve ever seen such a bald-faced lie on FR before.

Really?

Have you or have you not been advocating for women who have been raped to have abortions?

How is this not advocating putting the children of rapists to death?

You may not like the truth, but it is what it is.

312 posted on 02/08/2012 8:26:18 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

“Have you or have you not been advocating for women who have been raped to have abortions?”

I have not. I have been arguing for rape victims to not be forced to become pregnant. This means that I support them being given a choice under a rape exception to any law banning abortion.

You are either ignorant of the difference or you are a liar.


313 posted on 02/08/2012 8:29:53 AM PST by Grunthor (Mitt Romney and anyone supporting him can go fornicate themselves with a cactus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson