Do I need to paint you a more in depth picture than that?
So, violent rape that is immediately reported and a rape kit done would be considered rape, but women who didn't report the rape or women who were victims of non-violent "date rape" would be deemed to not have been raped?
Your question is a straw-man....a red-herring. Nowhere on this thread or any other have I suggested that there needed to be a suspect either identified or in custody. Do you believe that the criminal must be known for there to have been a crime comitted?
No, but THROUGHOUT this thread you have repeatedly called for the children of criminals to be put to death for non-capital crimes.
Your final question to me is just frankly, well stupid and I wont answer it.
Why is it stupid? YOU are advocating the execution of rapist's children, why should the children of arsonists, robbers and other criminals be exempt under your plan?
“So, violent rape that is immediately reported and a rape kit done would be considered rape,”
Depending upon what the results of the rape kit said, yes.
“but women who didn’t report the rape or women who were victims of non-violent “date rape” would be deemed to not have been raped?”
No, they just would not be allowed protection under the rape exception in my scenario.
“you have repeatedly called for the children of criminals to be put to death for non-capital crimes.”
Wow, I don’t think I’ve ever seen such a bald-faced lie on FR before.