Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IMR 4350

Well that’s the point right. The defendants didn’t show...so if you are the plaintiff and you are presented with that situation you can ask and you will receive a summary judgment.

Bingo, won, case over!

These idiots with their preponderance of arrogance wanting to show the world the evidence they had blew it.

They won the case and then they decided to lose the case.

Incredible...stupidity is what stupidity does.


67 posted on 02/04/2012 7:17:22 AM PST by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: surfer
The point of having the hearing was to so both sides could present their case and then the judge would make his decision based on what is in the record.

The judge didn't do that. He made his decision on information not in the record. Where did the information come from if it didn't come from the hearing?

It's not the judges place to act as an attorney for the defense which is what he has done, or he had a hearing with the defense of the record.

80 posted on 02/04/2012 7:47:50 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson