[David]

(c) Except in cases in which a hearing has been demanded under Code Section 50-13-12 [an aggrieved taxpayer filing against Department of Revenue *], subsection (a) of this Code section and the other provisions of this chapter concerning contested cases shall not apply to any case arising in the administration of the revenue laws, which case is subject to a subsequent de novo trial of the law and the facts in the superior court. --------------------------------- [note *] comment and emphasis are my own. You've got to get Obama on the witness stand to testify under oath about his citizenship after he returned from Indonesia. If not, contempt of Court can be requested in Georgia Superior Court.

(c) is ambiguous. It is not whether the de novo appeal right is for cases other than tax cases or for tax cases. Further, (c) does not appear to be where the de novo appeal right comes from.

Like everybody else, you need to recognize that there is a reason competent lawyers get paid what they get paid. If you had one in this case, you would likely get a result you would like much better than the result you have now.

[SvenMagnussen]

“Like everybody else, you need to recognize that there is a reason competent lawyers get paid what they get paid. If you had one in this case, you would likely get a result you would like much better than the result you have now.”

I’m please with the result. I posted the case would be de novo on appeal before the result was announced.

If Orly appeals, Obama will have to respond to summons to appear in GA Superior Court and testify under oath. It’s a civil suit. If the truth about Obama’s ineligibility is incriminating, then he’ll have to testify to it under oath. Even better, Nancy Pelosi filed a sworn statement Obama was eligible in Georgia in 2008. She is eligible for a deposition, a subpoena and production of records.