[DiogenesLamp]

No, actually. Your post was pedantic and meaningless. Natural Born Citizen means CITIZEN AT THE MOMENT OF BIRTH and NOTHING ELSE.

You can not prove that I am wrong on this point.

Proving you wrong is child's play. Aldo Mario Bellei (of Roger v Bellei) was a "CITIZEN AT THE MOMENT OF BIRTH." He lost his citizenship because he did not meet residency requirements. A "natural born citizen" does not have to meet any residency requirements.

See there? You are proven wrong, and it only took a few sentences.

And -— that frustrates you to no end.

And now YOU are in that boat. :)

[Bubba Ho-Tep]

A "natural born citizen" does not have to meet any residency requirements.

And where would that stipulation be found in the law? Where do you read that a Natural Born Citizen cannot lose his citizenship because of residency requirements?