Replies

You would be laughed at by nearly every Constitutional scholar in the country.

Your “Case Law” does not control in this matter, not at all.

It is entirely possible to despise Obama and STILL disagree with you.

You would be laughed at by nearly every Constitutional scholar in the country.

I'll never survive Laurence Tribe not liking me, sigh....

Btw... appeal to authority is a logical fallacy. It is the definition of the concept that matters.

You may well prove to be right in your legal assertions.
But the big picture here is most disturbing.
This is an actual case of law in progress with the POTUS as defendant; and not a peep from any GOP luminaries. Not a murmur in the MSM.
I'll say it again.

This is an actual case of law in progress with the POTUS as defendant

Wow.

In today's world JFK would be considered an extreme conservative radical war hawk.
There is no difference between any of the candidates, Republican or Democrat, We, the Republic, have been being denied the choice to say no to socialism.

It's a setup.

We, the Republic, have been loosing a war of financial attrition for decades. We, the Republic are engaged in a war with those who govern us. Drastic measures are required to defeat this enemy in order to stop the bleeding that each of us are seeing in the depreciation of our savings, the constant onslaught of taxes, fees, and licenses. Each of them designed to remove our ability to live free.
If a slave is a person who works for no money, then a paid person who works with no money left for savings or investment is therefore a slave. In each case work is done, the slave is fed and roofed.
Our only hope is spread the word as a grass roots effort and come up with a third party, and maybe after a decade or so, bring freedom to our cherished country.