I need to prove nothing else than I have because the Constitution proves it for me.
Your argument would result in a redundant coordinating conjunction in Article II.
But I would not expect you to understand what a redundant coordinating conjunction is because you obviously failed grammar as a child.
Nonsense.
You decided what you wanted, you ignored all legal rules to the contrary, you ignored the process of law in this country, you do not state English grammar in any way that supports your case, and you are WRONG!