Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kansas58
--You are wrong.--

You keep saying that.

The attitude you project is not backed up by the veracity of the supporting information in your posts.

337 posted on 02/02/2012 10:11:50 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf

Must be a sleeper.


340 posted on 02/02/2012 10:18:31 AM PST by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf
LOL
I need no authority other than logic.
I am using the “proof” of my opposition on this topic to prove them wrong.
NOBODY on this thread, in support of the radical birther arguments, really understands how the legal system works.
Every single Court case and authority the birthers use says, clearly, in the Court decision, that the Constitution provides no guidance for the definition of the term Natural Born Citizen.

Congress, therefore, does have the right to define the term, as it has done several times.

Natural Born Citizen means Citizen at Birth. The term has always meant the same thing, however the law/rules for obtaining automatic citizenship at birth have changed over time, several times.

343 posted on 02/02/2012 10:22:47 AM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson