To: Jim Robinson; Pride in the USA; Stillwaters
Go, Newt! How sweet would it be if Romney spent $17million to buy a state that isn’t even winner take all?
7 posted on
02/01/2012 4:09:09 PM PST by
lonevoice
(Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much.)
To: lonevoice
Go, Newt! How sweet would it be if Romney spent $17million to buy a state that isn’t even winner take all?
I hope Romney has to spend another $17,000,000 fighting to keep all the delegates, and then loses.
20 posted on
02/01/2012 4:13:44 PM PST by
ZX12R
(FUBO GTFO 2012 ! We should take off and Newt washington from orbit.)
To: lonevoice
That would be what the POS deserves for spending that kind of money to do nothing but beat someone to a pulp and then say, it wasn’t me . . . it was my Super PAC.
I saw them mention it on FOX but then my Dad from TX called and I couldn’t wait to get here to read more details.
111 posted on
02/01/2012 4:43:38 PM PST by
Qwackertoo
(Gingrich/West 2012)
To: lonevoice
Now this is great news! We can always hope for a miracle here. Go Newt!
To: lonevoice
212 posted on
02/01/2012 6:33:12 PM PST by
GVnana
(Newt 2012 - He Speaks for Us)
To: lonevoice
“How sweet would it be if Romney spent $17million to buy a state that isn’t even winner take all?”
Very. Even better for Ron Paul and Rick Santorum who pick up some delegates for free.
244 posted on
02/01/2012 7:31:13 PM PST by
RKBA Democrat
(Rand Paul for President 2016 (FR still rocks!!))
To: lonevoice
"How sweet would it be if Romney spent $17million to buy a state that isn’t even winner take all?" He did all that an more....with his IOWA LOSS.
260 posted on
02/01/2012 8:38:09 PM PST by
RasterMaster
("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson