Your cowardly ad hominem sums up your position and your character.
Cowardly? Since I posted my comment on the thread, and didn't make it as a private reply, how exactly would you characterize that as cowardly? You read the comment. I knew you would read the comment.
And yet you didn't post it to me.
I'm quite frankly not impressed by you or in fear of your opinion of me.
<yawn>
Ad hominen? I don't think so. Your position is unsubstantiated with respect to legalization being a conservative value - it is not, I state yet again. The ONLY reason for wanting legalization of dangerous recreational drugs is so that they can be used.
Obviously wrong - here are several reasons I posted in this thread:
Since you have so ardently taken the position you have, I can only assume you are drug addled. Cowardly? Not even in the slightest.
On another note, since you earlier brought it up, the issue of a "token" war on drugs being nonsense in your view - I give you Korea, Vietnam, and now the War on Terror. All three were and have been token wars.
I ask for the third time: How much more than the current tens of billions of taxpayer dollars every year would you like to spend on a real War On Drugs?
Now, do me a favor, and go choke on your meth pipe.
So, it is your position that fetuses have no rights against exposure to the toxins of recreations drugs. Got it. You're pro-abortion. Got it.