Posted on 01/27/2012 7:33:35 PM PST by RobinMasters
And the Georgia SoS is certainly not going to say “Obama meets all the requirements to be on the ballot but can't be on the ballots because he pissed off a judge.” Since when have judges been so special?
Not showing up makes the judge’s job real easy... facts/evidence is undisputed. Bamm! (gavel cracking judge’s bench)
Besides, the article says that they REJECTED a summary judgment. I think by presenting their case they took it off the table - the judge will now make a decision based purely on the merits of the case.
The primary question for consideration is which state will be next to follow Georgia’s lead
>>> The primary question for consideration is which state will be next to follow Georgias lead <<<
It looks like Alabama is on deck.
>>> To: little jeremiah; David
An Alabama Court has announced that it will hear arguments as to whether Barack Hussein Obama II is in fact eligible to appear on the State Presidential Primary Ballot.
Several Alabama citizens have filed a lawsuit within the Alabama Circuit Court to prevent certification of President Barack Obama for 2012 Alabama ballot access pending final hearing based on factual evidentiary hearings.
The deadline for any candidate to register to appear on the Alabama Presidential Primary ballot is just days away, but by agreeing to hear the case, the Alabama Courts have effectively stalled any efforts by the Democratic Party to place Obama on the ballot.
1,272 posted on Sunday, January 29, 2012 6:21:56 PM by Fred Nerks (AT YOUR OWN PERIL - FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1270 | View Replies | Report Abuse] <<<
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.