What I will never understand is how Perry never recovered from the “instate tuition” thing, which he could not veto and had nothing to do with illegal immigration.
Then Newt promotes Amnesty and folks cheered.
Not sure it is Newt per se, that people are cheering.
Speaking for myself tho, it is the fight we want to see, with some ruthless SOB thrown in.
Asking a bit much I know, for no modern Republican (save Palin in 08) has even come close.
It would be nice to die fighting on our feet for once, instead of on our knees begging for good press while being sliced from ear to ear.
Instate tuition is a form of amnesty.
Anyway, I'm still looking for an answer to my question.
If Newt wants to legalize illegals who have been here more than 25 years and if the last amnesty was about 26 years ago, just how many illegals would be covered by this new amnesty who weren't covered by the last amnesty?
It’s totally weird, mylife. Current Newt supporters would come on Perry threads and utterly damn him for what they thought was supporting illegals, which he never did.
Go figure.
I can’t.