Obviously, you haven’t attended to many Administrative Law Hearings. Regardless of seal or no seal, the Judge would not allow it to be entered as evidence if he didn’t rule it to be an undisputed fact. If no objection is heard, then its undisputed, regardless whether or not it has a raised seal.
From a witness at the Hearing:
“Court is called to order.
Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.”
Later ...
“Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.”
Obama’s BC is an undisputed fact for the Court to consider and the Indonesian school record was denied admissibility.
Undisputed in this context means deemed to be an authentic copy, not an authenticated certified BC. No birth certificate was present in the courtroom, so no BC could not have been entered into evidence under FRE 902. Only non-certifed images of two alleged birth certificates were deemed “undisputed” as a finding of fact, but only in this non-Orly case.