Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Triple

Obviously, you haven’t attended to many Administrative Law Hearings. Regardless of seal or no seal, the Judge would not allow it to be entered as evidence if he didn’t rule it to be an undisputed fact. If no objection is heard, then its undisputed, regardless whether or not it has a raised seal.

From a witness at the Hearing:

“Court is called to order.

Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.”

Later ...

“Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.”

Obama’s BC is an undisputed fact for the Court to consider and the Indonesian school record was denied admissibility.


779 posted on 01/26/2012 12:52:39 PM PST by SvenMagnussen (PSALMS 37:28 For the LORD loves justice and does not abandon the faithful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 751 | View Replies ]


To: SvenMagnussen
“Regardless of seal or no seal, the Judge would not allow it to be entered as evidence if he didn’t rule it to be an undisputed fact. If no objection is heard, then its undisputed, regardless whether or not it has a raised seal.”

Undisputed in this context means deemed to be an authentic copy, not an authenticated certified BC. No birth certificate was present in the courtroom, so no BC could not have been entered into evidence under FRE 902. Only non-certifed images of two alleged birth certificates were deemed “undisputed” as a finding of fact, but only in this non-Orly case.

972 posted on 01/26/2012 5:52:36 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson