The BC was challenged AFTER it had been enter by Plaintiffs and accepted as undisputed fact in an earlier case. Its fantasy to think the Judge will accept the COLB and Long form BC in one case as undisputed fact and then sustain testimony the evidence entered earlier as undisputed fact is fraudulent.
Non-jury civil trail Judges are allowed to hear testimony from irrelevant witnesses because it is assumed they won’t be prejudiced by hearsay. In other words, the Judge carefully listens to impassioned and concerned witnesses and then ignores them because their testimony is irrelevant hearsay.
what was accepted as an undisputed fact and by whom?
As for civil trials, you need to go to the Georgia Administrative Law
http://www.osah.ga.gov/documents/procedures/administrative-rules-osah.pdf
Keep panicking over nothing.