Seems to me he has been pretty prompt so far. If he rules for the plaintiff, Obumo’s troops will have to respond if they want him on the GA ballot. In any case, more publicity and that’s good.
I personally can’t see how judge can rule against but I’ve been disappointed before. The cases down here in Columbus were very disappointing and much of that had to do with pi$$ing matches between Orly and judge. I love Orly for her tenacity and what she’s doing. I just wish the facts(that I consider obvious)would get out there with no theatrics and/or distractions. Picking a better attouney is like picking the best politician - they all have strengths and weaknesses. Orly knows all the ins and outs, all the facts. She just struggles to present in a way that doesn’t try the court’s patience.
It would be a mistake to underestimate the power of the Chicago-style "thug politics" BO and his minions employ so effectively, including against judges who dare to consider serious Constitutional challenges to his qualifications for office.
I don’t see how he could rule against either. Evidence was presented of fraud and Obama, by not showing up, basically said it is true. But like you I would not be surprised if he does rule against.