Replies

First of all thank you for placing me in good company, "Fred Nerks; little jeremiah; DiogenesLamp; GregNH".

You summary is correct. Some of us "birthers" have been lead to believe that the BC issue is a sideshow, not going anywhere, it's the NBC issue you need to focus on, he was born in HI, look at the newspaper announcements, bla bla bla. It's also kind of funny watching the other plaintiffs in this GA challenge distance themselves from Orly.

Orly has been on the BC all along because she believes he was not born in the US. And that makes total sense. He has a fake ID! No records of BHOII anywhere, stolen SSN, forged SS application, photoshopped family pictures, on and on. IF "one" was born in the US of A "one" wouldn't need all these fake documents.

The question is "Who is he and WHO sent him."

Soviet Acknowledged Obama One of Them

When we look at his actions we can clearly see he purposely destroying our nation. We also have to understand that this fight is not going to end in a court of law. When he they realize they have been outed he they will do something drastic. You don't get this close to destroying the United States of America to go off into the sunset quietly.

My position is he hasn't proven anything, not even that he was actually born in the United States. Ordinarily a birth certificate issued by a state would be good enough to establish that someone was actually born there, but because Hawaii has peculiar birth certificate laws, (allowing people to obtain Hawaiian birth certificates who were not actually born there) it throws that entire standard of proof out the window.

At this point, we don't know where he was born, but we DO know that if a foreigner is his father, then he doesn't meet the original requirement of being a natural citizen.

I say we attack everything and see what falls out.

Greg, if ‘they’ had anything to show he was who ‘they’ want us to believe he is, we would have been shown images of his adoring mother with her little baby boy - until we were sick of seeing them. But what do we get? One image of him at the age of about two, sitting on a fence ‘at the zoo’ and one image of zero at the beach with Stanley Armour Dunham.

So he shows up in Hawaii at the age of around two or more and that’s all the physical evidence there is?

No photograph with his ‘mother’ or ‘grandmother’ as a baby? Why not? Because they didn’t have any, that’s why. The only baby image there is was impossible to manipulate.

So back to the question; who is he, who were his parents, where did he come from, where was he born?