Replies

What about this?

Georgia Administrative law rules 8-1-2.18

(e) documentary evidence in the form of copies if the original is not readily available, if its use would unduly disrupt the records of the possessor of the original, or by agreement of the parties. Upon request, parties shall have an opportunity to compare the copy with the original. Documentary evidence may also be received in the form of excerpts, charts, or summaries when, in the discretion of the Administrative Law Judge, the use of the entire document would unnecessarily add to the record’s length. The entire document shall be made available for examination or copying, or both, by other parties at a reasonable time and place.

http://www.osah.ga.gov/documents/procedures/administrative-rules-osah.pdf

“Upon request, parties shall have an opportunity to compare the copy with the original.”

Sven just posted this elsewhere, I hope someone explains the import and I find the comment, I assume it means all the evidence/testimony shown in the GA case will have to be done all over again, by which ever lawyers show up?

“It is the understanding of the first two attorneys to present their cases that, whichever way the judge decides will ultimately result in an appeal, and with their evidence being presented, they have prepared their cases to proceed to the highest court in the land, if necessary.”

No!

An appeal will be to Georgia Superior Court and it will be de novo (fresh start, new case). Evidence and testimony will have to be introduced, again.

The Administrative Hearing is a function of the Georgia legislative branch. Georgia Superior Court is a function of the Georgia Judicial branch. Obama and his attorney know this and are not worried about a default judgement which will result in the GA SoS taking Obama off the Georgia Preferential Ballot. They’ll appeal the GA SoS’s action and new trial will be held in Georgia Superior Court, de novo.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2840204/posts#30